This post appeared originally in our sysadvent series and has been moved here following the discontinuation of the sysadvent microsite
The intention of this post is to get oneself kick-started into playing with Platform as a Service (PaaS) by interacting with a lab environment that is running in a VM on your local machine. It relies heavily on other parties (OpenShiftOrigin, jmorales, Red Hat and JavaZone) prior work that I “abuse” in this post.
The environment consists of CentOS Linux, OpenShift Origin with master/node roles, GitLab, Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager and Lab contents.
Do not Get PaaS-ed By
In order to play along locally with the activities in this post one needs OpenShift Origin up and running. We will address this with a VM running on VirtualBox with Vagrant. So, get hold of VirtualBox (version 5.0) and Vagrant (version 1.8.4) for your OS, download the “box”, start it and check that it’s alive:
$ vagrant box add jmorales/origin-labs --provider virtualbox
$ cd ~/vagrant/origin-labs
$ vagrant up
Bringing machine 'default' up with 'virtualbox' provider...
...
==> default: Booting VM...
==> default: Waiting for machine to boot. This may take a few minutes...
default: SSH address: 127.0.0.1:2222
default: SSH username: vagrant
default: SSH auth method: private key
...
==> default: Machine booted and ready!
...
$ vagrant box list
jmorales/origin-labs (virtualbox, 1.3.0-alpha.3)
Enter PaaS-ground
Test SSH login to your VM:
$ ssh vagrant@127.0.0.1 -p 2222 -i \
~/vagrant/origin-labs/.vagrant/machines/default/virtualbox/private_key
Last login: Wed Nov 23 05:19:52 2016 from 10.0.2.2
$
Access the Web Console by directing your browser to https://10.2.2.2:8443 and logging in as both
Username: dev
Password: dev
and
Username: admin
Password: admin
You are good to go, yay :-)
Let the PaaS fun begin
Direct your browser to your VM with this URL http://labs.apps.10.2.2.2.xip.io/ and work through the exercises, starting with Installing the oc client tool.
Have fun!
Comparison of different compression tools
Working with various compressed files on a daily basis, I found I didn’t actually know how the different tools performed compared to each other. I know different compression will best fit different types of data, but I wanted to compare using a large generic file.
The setup
The file I chose was a 4194304000 byte (4.0 GB) Ubuntu installation disk image.
The machine tasked with doing of the bit-mashing was an Ubuntu with a AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core ... [continue reading]